A new version of the Internet (version 2.0) is now available. Libraries are now free to abandon the first one.
-- Posted from Internet Librarian 2007.
11 comments:
Anonymous
said...
Yeah, well, first I'd have to come up with some circulation stats to show that the old one was checked out of the building enough to warrant getting a new one.
Better yet, I believe this makes the puny 1.0 eligible to be included with all the other donations we never asked for... in the library's next book sale!
What's a fair price for an outdated item like this? Free to good home, perhaps.
I'm confused. I applied for a job that asked "what is your opinion on how to apply Web 2.0?, or some such shit. I had no clue what they were talking about. What is it anyway??
Back in the old days you could have fallen back on "It's a paradigm shift in the way that we work," but that's been laughed out of existence.
The sensible (and so almost certainly wrong) answer is "We need to be careful that our application of the technology is driven by the needs of the service and our customers and not that the needs of the service and our customers is defined by the application of the technology."
11 comments:
Yeah, well, first I'd have to come up with some circulation stats to show that the old one was checked out of the building enough to warrant getting a new one.
So, was the first a beta version? I never did get it to work right...
Oh! Ha, I never can keep up with this technology stuff. What's this "internet" do, now?
so does this mean we can stop offering the outdated internet to the patrons?
Better yet, I believe this makes the puny 1.0 eligible to be included with all the other donations we never asked for... in the library's next book sale!
What's a fair price for an outdated item like this? Free to good home, perhaps.
We'll hang onto our copy on the off-chance that The Big Bang loses momentum and time starts going backwards.
This is pretty much the only policy we have on anything in our library service.
I'm confused. I applied for a job that asked "what is your opinion on how to apply Web 2.0?, or some such shit. I had no clue what they were talking about. What is it anyway??
Back in the old days you could have fallen back on "It's a paradigm shift in the way that we work," but that's been laughed out of existence.
The sensible (and so almost certainly wrong) answer is "We need to be careful that our application of the technology is driven by the needs of the service and our customers and not that the needs of the service and our customers is defined by the application of the technology."
Or, as a college director said when I tried to introduce "23 Things"; "Does the College have access to web 2.0?"
Kevin Musgrove, you sound like a college professor. I thought I had to give up that nonsense writing when I finally graduated from Library School.
Actually, that nonsense writing did help me to make a nonsense response. Didn't get the job, though. Probably a *good* thing.
^^ nice blog!! ^@^
徵信,徵信網,徵信社,徵信社,感情挽回,婚姻挽回,挽回婚姻,挽回感情,徵信,徵信社,徵信,徵信,捉姦,徵信公司,通姦,通姦罪,抓姦,抓猴,捉猴,捉姦,監聽,調查跟蹤,反跟蹤,外遇問題,徵信,捉姦,女人徵信,女子徵信,外遇問題,女子徵信, 外遇,徵信公司,徵信網,外遇蒐證,抓姦,抓猴,捉猴, 調查跟蹤,反跟蹤,感情挽回,挽回感情,婚姻挽回,挽回婚姻,外遇沖開,抓姦, 女子徵信,外遇蒐證,外遇,通姦,通姦罪,贍養費,徵信,徵信社,抓姦,徵信,徵信公司,徵信社,徵信公司,徵信社,徵信公司,女人徵信,
徵信,徵信網,徵信社, 徵信網,外遇,徵信,徵信社,抓姦,徵信,女人徵信,徵信社,女人徵信社,外遇,抓姦,徵信公司,徵信社,徵信社,徵信社,徵信社,徵信社,女人徵信社,徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信,女子徵信社,女子徵信社,女子徵信社,女子徵信社, 徵信,徵信社, 徵信,徵信社, 徵信社,
徵信,徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信,徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信,徵信社,徵信, 徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 外遇, 抓姦, 離婚, 外遇,離婚,
徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信,徵信社,徵信社,徵信,外遇, 抓姦, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社, 徵信社,徵信,徵信, 徵信,外遇, 抓姦
徵徵徵徵徵徵徵信徵徵徵徵徵徵外遇抓姦離婚婚前徵信工商徵信尋人大陸抓姦法律諮詢家暴徵徵徵徵婚前徵信工商徵信外遇抓姦尋人離婚家暴大陸抓姦感情挽回徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵
徵徵徵徵徵婚姻挽回徵徵徵徵徵大陸抓姦徵徵徵尋人徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵
徵徵徵徵徵徵大陸抓姦徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵徵,徵信,徵信社
Post a Comment